WhitePaper EN
  • WhitePaper DeflationCoin
  • 1. Introduction
  • 1.0. Preface
  • 1.1. The Socio-Economic Consequences of Inflation
  • 1.2. The process of exporting inflation from the U.S. to other countries
  • 1.3. A Global Bankrupt Disguised as a "Financial Leader"
  • 1.4. The Birth of the Crypto Industry
  • 1.5. Bitcoin’s Limitations
  • 1.6. A Cryptocurrency Without the Flaws of "Digital Gold"
  • 2. Mission and Objectives
    • 2.0. Mission and Objectives
  • 3. Operating and design principles
    • 3.0. Preface
    • 3.1. Limited Supply with Zero Inflation
    • 3.2. Daily Smart-Burning of Coins
    • 3.3. Deflationary Halving—Unlike Bitcoin.
    • 3.4. Smart-Staking
    • 3.5. Smart Dividends
    • 3.6. Gradual Unlocking
    • 3.7. Basket and Pump (BaP)
    • 3.8. Attention Capture Mechanism
    • 3.9. Blockchain-Integrated Affiliate Marketing
  • 3.10. Smart Fees
  • 3.11. Deflationary Ecosystem
  • 3.11.1. Educational Gambling
  • 3.11.2. Potential Directions for Scaling the Ecosystem
  • 3.11.3. Legal and Regulatory Aspects of the Ecosystem
  • 3.12. Environmental Principle
  • 3.13. Geometric Progression in Coin Distribution
  • 3.14. Automated Diversification Across Exchanges
  • 3.15. Online Node
  • 3.16. Open Source Blockchain and Financial Transparency of the Ecosystem
  • 3.17. Three-Level Decision-Making Mechanism: "Proof-of-Deflation"
  • 3.17.1. Meritocracy of Ideas
  • 3.17.2. Skin in the game
  • 3.17.3. The Right to Veto
  • 3.18. The principle of “Humor and Memes”
  • 4. Team
    • 4.0. Preface
    • 4.1. Natoshi Sakamoto
  • 4.2. Vitalik But Not-Buterin
  • 4.3. DeflationCoin Mafia
  • 5. Tokenomics
    • 5.0. Preface
  • 5.1. Token Distribution
  • 5.2. The 50% | 50% Expenditure Principle
  • 6. Blockchain architecture level
    • Minus 1 level (-L1)
  • 7. Technical Architecture
    • 7.0. Technical Architecture
    • 7.1. Reliability and Security Architecture
    • 7.2. Cryptographic Security Methods
    • 7.3. Conceptual Architecture of DeflationCoin
    • 7.3.1. Smart Contract Architecture
  • 7.3.2. Online Node
  • 7.3.3. Deflationary Ecosystem
  • 7.3.4. Automated Order Placement on DEX
  • 7.4. Development and Transition to a Proprietary Innovative Blockchain.
  • 8. asset rating
    • 8.0. Asset Rating
  • 8.1. Detailed analysis of indicators
  • 9. Conclusion
    • 9. Conclusion
  • 10. Reference
    • 10. Reference
  • 11. Contact Information
    • 11. Contact Information
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  • Mathematically, this is expressed as:
  • The hash mark is calculated as:
  • Benefits of Using BSC for Reliability and Security:
  1. 7. Technical Architecture

7.1. Reliability and Security Architecture

BSC is built upon modern cryptographic methods to ensure the security of transactions, wallets and user data. A key feature is its Proof-of-Stake Authority (PoSA) algorithm, which combines Proof-of-Stake and Authority models to achieve an optimal balance between decentralization and scalability. Transactions and operations within the network are validated by a limited set of authorized validators, ensuring the network's integrity.

For cryptographic security, BSC employs an Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (ECDSA) based on the secp256k1 curve, widely recognized in Ethereum-compatible ecosystems.

Mathematically, this is expressed as:

P=k⋅G P = k \cdot G P=k⋅G

where:

  • k — private key,

  • P — public key,

  • G — base point of the curve.

To ensure data immutability, BSC uses the keccak256 hash function (a variant of SHA-3), guaranteeing that data cannot be tampered with or altered. Block headers and transaction data are hashed into a Merkle tree structure, allowing efficient transaction integrity verification.

The hash mark is calculated as:

H(M)=keccak256⁡(M) H(M) = \operatorname{keccak256}(M) H(M)=keccak256(M)

  • M — represents input data.

Any changes to the data result in a completely different hash mark, eliminating the possibility of tampering.

BSC employs a limited set of validators to ensure high throughput and reduce vulnerabilities. Validators are periodically rotated based on staking and voting, minimizing centralization risks. Additionally, compatibility with the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM) ensures the secure execution of smart contracts.

BSC’s modular structure ensures that even in the event of validator or shard compromise, the consequences for the entire network are minimal.

Wallets within the BSC ecosystem are designed with security in mind. Private keys are stored locally on the user’s device and encrypted. Popular wallets, such as MetaMask, support integration with hardware wallets (Ledger and Trezor) and can be used with multisignature services like Gnosis Safe. Even if the device is compromised, access to funds remains impossible without the password and private key.

Benefits of Using BSC for Reliability and Security:

  • Multisignature support (Multisig): Transactions require signatures from multiple participants, providing enhanced protection, particularly for corporate and DAO wallets.

  • Emphasis on transaction speed and cost-efficiency: While slightly less decentralized than Ethereum, the network achieves approximately 100 TPS (transactions per second) with an average transaction cost of around $0.50.

  • EVM compatibility: Enables developers to efficiently create and deploy smart contracts written in Solidity. The well-developed ecosystem simplifies the creation of applications on the BSC platform.

  • Protection mechanisms: Includes safeguards against reentrancy attacks and detailed operation logging, minimizing vulnerabilities such as reentrancy and data overflow attacks.

Previous7.0. Technical ArchitectureNext7.2. Cryptographic Security Methods

Last updated 2 hours ago